Umar Akmal couldn’t contest PCB’s corruption charges |
Umar Akmal played a tall position in Quetta Gladiators’ title employ last season PSL

3: 41 PM GMT

  • ESPNcricinfo workers

Umar Akmal has foregone the true to defend himself in opposition to the PCB’s corruptions charges and would per chance well presumably aloof as an replacement wait for a sanction to be confirmed.

His case will plug straight to the Chairman of the Disciplinary Panel after Akmal determined in opposition to soliciting for a hearing sooner than the Anti-Corruption Tribunal. All that continues to be, then, is for the costs to be confirmed by the Disciplinary Committee Chairman, Justice (retired) Fazal-e-Miran Chauhan and the sanction handed out.

The confirmation of the offences shall be followed by levying appropriate sanctions, which in Akmal’s case differ from a six month suspension to a life ban. Even supposing the PCB confirmed there had been no formal or casual discussions with Akmal surrounding the costs, his resolution to, in attain, accept whatever sanctions come his manner, would per chance well presumably potentially impression any punishment incurred favourably.

The PCB formally charged Akmal with two breaches of its anti-corruption code for two unrelated incidents on March 20. The costs come beneath Article 2.4.4, which deals with: “Failing to offer away to the PCB Vigilance and Safety Department (without pointless extend) fat major aspects of any approaches or invitations got by the Participant to steal in Immoral Habits beneath this Anti-Corruption Code”.

Akmal had been provisionally suspended on February 20, and changed into as soon as issued the eye of payment on March 17. “Till the Chairman of the Disciplinary Panel has announced his resolution, the PCB is now not going to comment on the topic,” a PCB media starting up said.

This is now not Justice Chauhan’s first involvement in high-profile cases affecting Pakistan cricket over basically the most up-to-date past. He changed into as soon as on the Anti-Corruption Trial tribunal that the PCB referred Nasir Jamshed’s case for adjudication to, as effectively as the fair adjudicator on the case touching on a misconduct complaint in opposition to PCB Board of Governors member Numan Butt.

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *